BOARD HISTORY · COMPARE EDITIONS

What changed?

v1.1 · rev 5 (October 20, 2026) → v1.1 · rev 9 (October 29, 2026) · the current board.

Scores comparable. Same board version (v1.1): score changes are directly comparable. Rank depends on the field: a model can move without its own score changing.
MODELS44 → 47on each board
NEW3added in the newer edition
NO LONGER LISTED0not a failure
RANK UP / DOWN0 / 31of 44 on both
ABC TEST CHANGES0PASS / FAIL / N/A verdicts
ModelRankChangeBlind Bantu meanΔABC Test
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 1 → 1—16.8 → 16.8+0.0FAIL
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 2 → 2—15.1 → 15.1+0.0FAIL
Claude Fable 5 ‡Anthropic 3 → 3—14.7 → 14.7+0.0FAIL
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 4 → 4—14.6 → 14.6+0.0FAIL
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 5 → 5—14.2 → 14.2+0.0FAIL
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 6 → 6—14.0 → 14.0+0.0FAIL
Gemini 3 ◊Google 7 → 7—13.9 → 13.9+0.0FAIL
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 8 → 8—13.4 → 13.4+0.0FAIL
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 9 → 9—12.9 → 12.9+0.0FAIL
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 10 → 10—12.8 → 12.8+0.0FAIL
Qwen 3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba 11 → 11—12.5 → 12.5+0.0FAIL
Qwen 3.8 MaxAlibaba 12 → 12—12.0 → 12.0+0.0FAIL
GPT-5.5OpenAI 13 → 13—11.8 → 11.8+0.0FAIL
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI — → 14New11.8—FAIL
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 14 → 15▼ 111.7 → 11.7+0.0FAIL
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 15 → 16▼ 111.6 → 11.6+0.0FAIL
Grok 4.6SpaceXAI 16 → 17▼ 111.2 → 11.2+0.0FAIL
GLM-5.2Z.ai / Zhipu 17 → 18▼ 110.1 → 10.1+0.0FAIL
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI — → 19New9.9—FAIL
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 18 → 20▼ 29.4 → 9.4+0.0FAIL
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle 19 → 21▼ 29.1 → 9.1+0.0FAIL
DeepSeek V4DeepSeek 20 → 22▼ 29.0 → 9.0+0.0FAIL
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek 21 → 23▼ 28.9 → 8.9+0.0FAIL
Grok 4.5SpaceXAI 22 → 24▼ 28.7 → 8.7+0.0FAIL
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 23 → 25▼ 28.1 → 8.1+0.0FAIL
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 24 → 26▼ 27.4 → 7.4+0.0FAIL
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 25 → 27▼ 27.1 → 7.1+0.0FAIL
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI 26 → 28▼ 27.0 → 7.0+0.0FAIL
Kimi K3Moonshot AI 27 → 29▼ 26.8 → 6.8+0.0FAIL
Qwen 3.7Alibaba 28 → 30▼ 26.7 → 6.7+0.0FAIL
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 29 → 31▼ 26.7 → 6.7+0.0FAIL
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA 30 → 32▼ 26.2 → 6.2+0.0FAIL
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 31 → 33▼ 25.9 → 5.9+0.0FAIL
MiniMax M3MiniMax 32 → 34▼ 25.7 → 5.7+0.0FAIL
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 33 → 35▼ 25.2 → 5.2+0.0FAIL
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 34 → 36▼ 25.0 → 5.0+0.0FAIL
Kimi K2.7Moonshot AI 35 → 37▼ 24.9 → 4.9+0.0FAIL
GPT-OSS 120BOpenAI 36 → 38▼ 23.9 → 3.9+0.0FAIL
Command A+Cohere 37 → 39▼ 23.4 → 3.4+0.0FAIL
GLM-5.3 FlashZ.ai / Zhipu 38 → 40▼ 23.1 → 3.1+0.0FAIL
InklingThinking Machines Lab 39 → 41▼ 23.0 → 3.0+0.0FAIL
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI — → 42New2.4—FAIL
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta 40 → 43▼ 32.0 → 2.0+0.0FAIL
Nemotron Lightning 3.5 30BNVIDIA 41 → 44▼ 31.5 → 1.5+0.0FAIL
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft 42 → 45▼ 30.2 → 0.2+0.0FAIL
Grok 4.7SpaceXAI 43 → 46▼ 30.0 → 0.0+0.0FAIL
GLM-5.3Z.ai / Zhipu 44 → 47▼ 3— → ——FAIL
A model missing from an edition was not on that board (not yet evaluated, superseded or retired). Absence is never a benchmark failure. ABC Test verdicts (PASS / FAIL / N_A) are derived per edition from its own published scores and protocol; mastery_changes counts changed verdicts. First place is not a PASS.